SEPARATION
OF PHOSPHOLIPIDS
BY HPLC
With UV detection,
several solvent systems were proposed for the separation of phospholipid classes but they
are generally based on acetonitrile or hexane/2-propanol. With the first,
phosphatidylethanolamine elutes before phosphatidylcholine which is itself eluted before
sphingomyelin. The acidic lipids, such as phosphatidic acid, cardiolipin and
phosphatidylinositol, are eluted before phosphatidylethanolamine. Mobile phases containing
hexane/2-propanol allow also phosphatidylethanolamine to be eluted before
phosphatidylcholine, but the latter and sphingomyelin are not well separated. In contrast,
phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylserine are eluted between phosphatidylethanolamine
and phosphatidylcholine. As phospholipids are ionic molecules, a counter-ion is required
in the running solution. Sulfuric and phosphoric acids have been proposed but better
results were obtained with the addition of 0.5 mM serine (Christie WW, J Chromatogr
1986, 361, 396).
With the light-scattering detection new eluting systems were designed to avoid the
interferences from non volatile modifiers added to the solvents (acids, salts...).
Application notes with details on the
detection of several phospholipids with a light scattering device (Corona
Charged aerosol detector) may be found on the manufacturer web
site1 and 2.
All that applies to intact phospholipids and enables to
determine their relative amount and possibly their composition after
post-detector collection.
Sometimes, the direct HPLC separation is not enough efficient and a previous
deacylation is needed. Thus, for the fine analysis of polyphosphoinositides, the
total phospholipids or fractions purified by TLC are deacylated and the water
soluble products (glycerophosphoinositol phosphates) are separated
by HPLC with an anion exchange column.
![]()
ANALYSIS OF
INTACT PHOSPHOLIPIDS
Two types of separation are selected:
Separation based on a silica column
First method
The proposed method used a ternary gradient and
was used to separate all lipid classes but can be easily adapted for the separation of
only phospholipid classes (Lutzke BS et al., L Lipid Res 1990, 31, 2127).
Apparatus:
HPLC system, light scattering detector
3µm silica column (10 cm x 4.6 mm)
Reagents:
iso-octane, tetrahydrofurane (THF), 2-propanol,
chloroform.
Procedure:
Mobile phase A: iso-octane/THF, 99/1 (v/v)
Mobile phase B: 2-propanol/chloroform, 80/20 (v/v)
Mobile phase C: 2-propanol/water, 50/50 (v/v)
The gradient of solvents is complex and combined with a flow gradient for about 32 min.
The authors demonstrated that they could easily separate lipid classes from rat tissues in
30 min and detect 1 µg or less of any of the separated lipids. Cerebrosides and
sulfatides co-migrated (elution time: about 12 min). However, sphingomyelin was not
completely separated from phosphatidylcholine at the end of the run. The procedure was
reproducible and allows the detection of low levels of phospholipids (200 ng) in a sample
of no more than 80 µg of total heart lipids.
Second method
The proposed method is based on a binary
gradient of chloroform and methanol solutions and can be considered as one of the most
efficient methods (Becart J et al., J High Resolution Chromatogr 1990, 13, 126). A
diol column may be used instead of the proposed silica gel column.
Apparatus:
HPLC system, light-scattering detector
Lichrospher Si 60, 5 µm, 12 cm x 4 mm, Merck
Reagents:
Chloroform, methanol, ammonium hydroxide.
Procedure:
Mobile phase A:
chloroform/methanol/ammonium hydroxide, 80/19.5/0.5 (v/v)
Mobile phase B: chloroform/methanol/water/ammonium hydroxide, 60/34/5.5/0.5 (v/v)
The gradient is: 0-14 min: linear from A/B, 50/50 to 100% B, 14-25 min: hold 100% B, 25-30
min: 100% B to A/B, 50/50 and 15 min regeneration before another injection. Samples are
dissolved in the mixture chloroform/methanol/water (70/25/5) before injection. The flow
rate is 1 ml/min.

1: phosphatidylethanolamine, 2: phosphatidylinositol, 3: phosphatidylserine, 4:
phosphatidylcholine, 5: phosphatidic acid, 6 and 7: sphingomyelin, 8:
lysophosphatidylcholine.
To prevent the dissolution of the silica packing by low pH buffer, it was proposed to use an linear elution program with chloroform/methanol/triethylamine buffer (87.5/12/0.5, v/v), titrated at pH 3 with 1M formic acid at t=0 min to 28/60/12 at 16 min. Efficient separations with phosphatidic acid eluting before phosphatidylethanolamine were obtained and no loss of column performance was observed after 1500 runs (Rombaut R et al., J Dairy Sci 2005, 88, 482).
![]()
Separation based on a diol column
1 - Separation of the classical phospholipids
Olsson NJ at al., J Chromatogr, 1996, 681, 213
Apparatus:
HPLC system, light-scattering detector
Nucleosil 100-7 OH DIOL column (25 cm x 4 mm, 7 µm from Macherey-Nagel).
Reagents:
Hexane, 2-propanol, butanol, THF, iso-octane
Procedure:
Mobile phase A:
hexane/2-propanol/butanol/THF/iso-octane/water, 64.5/17.5/7/5/5/1 (v/v)
Mobile phase B: 2-propanol/butanol/THF/iso-octane/water, 73/7/5/5/10 (v/v)
ammonium acetate was added to both solvents (180 mg/l)
The binary gradient was linear over 50 min from 0% to a final composition of 100% B. The
column was maintained at 65°C and the flow rate at 1 ml/min
The authors claimed that the DIOL phase column was notably resistant. Acidic phospholipids
were adequately separated. Moreover, a partial resolution was obtained between alkenyl-PE
and diacyl-PE. A similar method was proposed for plant lipids (Arnoldsson KC et
al., in
"Phospholipids: characterization, metabolism, and novel biological
applications". Cevc G, Paltauf F, Eds, AOCS Press, Champaign, Ill, 1995, 44).

PE: diacyl-phosphatidylethanolamine, PI: phosphatidylinositol, PA: phosphatidic acid, PS:
phosphatidylserine, PC: phosphatidylcholine, SM: sphingomyelin
When plasmalogens are present, the corresponding peak is ahead of diacyl-PE. Complex
glycolipids can also be separated with this HPLC method, cerebrosides being eluted at
about 5 min and sulfatides 2 min before PE. To maintain peaks within the calibrated range
of phospholipid standards, the authors injected no more than 250 µg phospholipids.
Further analysis may be run on fractions with a higher column sample load (about 0.5 mg
lipids).
2 - Separation of intact plasmalogens
Pc and PE
plasmalogens may be separated from all phospholipids by a single HPLC run (Mawatari
S et al., Anal Biochem 2007, 370, 54).
The separation was done using a Lichrosphere
100 Diol, (250 · 4 mm, 5 lm, Agilent Technologies).
The mobile phase A was
hexane/2-propanol/acetic acid (82:17:1, v/v) with 0.08% triethylamine (TEA), and
the mobile phase B was 2-propanol/water/acetic acid (85:14:1, v/v) with 0.08%
TEA. Mobile phase A was 95% at 0 min and decreased linearly to 60% in 23 min.
The gradient continued from 60% A to 15% A in 4 min, and 15% A was maintained
for 1 min. Then mobile phase A was increased to 95% in 4 min, and 95% A was
maintained for 5 min. The turnaround time was 37 min. The flow rate was 1
ml/min, and the column temperature was 50°C. Each phospholipid class was
detected by a light scattering detector.

HPLC chromatogram of phospholipids from chicken breast muscle
ppl-PE : PE plasmalogens, pl-PC : PC plasmalogens
3 - Separation of phosphatidic acid and lysophosphatidic acid
Holland WL et al., J Lipid Res 2003, 44, 854-8
As phosphatidic acid and its lyso compounds are involved in the regulation
of various cellular processes, there is a necessity to quantify accurately these
bioactive lipids in cellular extracts. Below is described a method which allows
their accurate quantification using a chloroform/methanol (1/2, v/v) extraction,
a diol HPLC column ( Supelcosil
LC-318 diol column (25 cm long, 4.6 ID, 5 mm
particle size), a ternary basic gradient (Stith BJ et al., J Lipid Res 2000,
41, 1448) and a light scattering detector.

The use of radio labelled molecules
allowed the authors to estimate a total recovery rate of 48% for phosphatidic
acid and 53% for its lyso compound. A polynomial third-order cubic regression
equation was used to quantify the phospholipids.
A simple HPLC method was described for the simultaneous analysis
of phosphatidylcholine and its lyso derivatives (Adlercreutz D et al., JAOCS
2001, 78, 1007). This method was proposed to be suitable for studying
reactions on the phospholipid and acyl migration of its lyso derivatives.
A simple HPLC method has been reported for the separation of cardiolipin by HPLC
(Barcelo-Coblijn G et al. JAOCS 2008, 43, 971).
A review by Van der Meeren P et al. of several HPLC separation
techniques for phospholipid groups may be found in the book "Food
analysis by HPLC" (Nollet LML Ed., Marcel Dekker inc, 1992).
![]()
ANALYSIS OF
POLYPHOSPHOINOSITIDES (DEACYLATED FORMS)
The study of the various phosphoinositide isomers is
done after removing the fatty acyl groups and separating the deacylated forms by
HPLC with a salt gradient. Since the water-soluble derivatives have no
absorption characteristics, the methodology involves the determination of
radioactive products. Thus, an on-line continuous flow liquid scintillation detector
is required. Nonradioactive forms may be determined using a conductivity
detector (see below).
Procedure:
Deacylation of phospholipids: The lipids dried or adsorbed to silica
gel are treated in a screw-capped glass tube with 1.8 ml of deacylating reagent
(40% methylamine/water/methanol/butanol, 5.4/3.2/9.1/2.3, v/v) at 53°C for 50
min (water bath). The mixture (or the supernatant if the silica gel is
present) is then evaporated under a nitrogen flow in a well ventilated hood.
Water (2 ml) is added to the dried residue, the solution is deeply frozen and
then freeze-dried. The dried samples are resuspended in 2 ml of water, and
extracted with an equal volume of butanol/petroleum ether/ethyl formate (20/4/1,
v/v). The aqueous phase is again freeze-dried and stored at -70°C until
analysis by HPLC.
HPLC analysis of deacylated phospholipids:
Column: Partisphere SAX from Whatman (5mm,
250 x 4 mm).
Elution: a discontinuous gradient obtained from mixing solution A (water) and
solution B (1M (NH4)2HPO4 titrated at pH 8 with conc. phosphoric acid) according
to the table below:
|
Time (min) |
Flow |
A (%) | B (%) |
| 0 | 1 | 100 | 0 |
| 5 | 1 | 100 | 0 |
| 65 | 1 | 82 | 18 |
| 102 | 1 | 57 | 43 |
| 102.1 | 1 | 100 | 0 |
| 102.2 | 1 | 100 | 0 |
| 102.3 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| 122 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| 122.1 | 1 | 100 | 0 |
| 122.2 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
Non-radioactive nucleotides (AMP,
ADP and ATP) are added to the aqueous sample (total volume: 0.1 up to 1 ml)
prior filtration and injection to allow monitoring with a UV detector to
evaluate the reproducibility of elution times. We add 20 ml
of a mixture containing 200 mM
of each nucleotide to 1 ml sample.
The method of suppressed conductivity detection was shown to be efficient in
determining the amounts of isoforms of phosphatidylinnositol monophosphates
(PI2P et PI) and biphosphates (PI3,4P2, PI4,5P2 and PI3,5P2)
(Nasuhoglu
C et al., Anal Biochem 2002, 301, 243). The major anionic head group can
be identified down to a detection limit of about 100 pmol but that detection
remains 1 to 2 log units less sensitive than for isotope techniques. That
procedure was shown to be efficient in the study of the activation of
phosphatidylinositide kinase. An application note for the separation of inositol
phosphates using a conductivity or an electrochemical detector may be found on
the Dionex
site.
|
OTHER ANALYTICAL METHODS |
- Quantification of
major classes of Xenopus phospholipids.
Stith
BJ et al., J
Lipid Res 2000, 41,
1448–1454
- Preparation of purified
phosphatidylcholine by HPLC.
Yoon TH et al., J Chromatogr A 2002, 949, 209-216
A simple HPLC procedure which enables the preparation from egg yolk of
about 5 mg PC with 99% purity per unit gram stationary phase.
- Separation of soybean phospholipids by HPLC.
Kang DH et al., J Chromatogr A 2002, 949, 217-223
A preparative procedure to separate PE, PI, and PC from soybean. Several
mobile phases and sorbents were studied to improve separations.
- Nonradioactive analysis of phosphatidylinositides and other anionic
phospholipids by anion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography with
suppressed conductivity detection.
Nasuhoglu C et al., Anal Biochem 2002, 301, 243-254
High-performance liquid chromatography with evaporative
light-scattering detection for the determination of phospholipid classes in
human milk, infant formulas and phospholipid
sources of long-chain
polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Sala Vila, A, et al., J Chromatogr A, 2003,
1008, 73-80.
Light-scattering detection of phospholipids resolved by HPLC.
Descalzo AM et al., Lipids 2003, 38, 999-1003
Method adapted to lung surfactant using a gradient based on isopropanol/hexane/water
combined with methanol and acetonitrile on a silica column.
Analysis of phospho- and sphingolipids in dairy products by a new HPLC method.
Rombaut R et al., J Dairy Sci 2005, 88, 482-8